KMID : 1011820210620040430
|
|
Investigative and Clinical Urology 2021 Volume.62 No. 4 p.430 ~ p.437
|
|
The clinical impact of strict criteria for active surveillance of prostate cancer in Korean population: Results from a prospective cohort
|
|
Suh Jun-Gyo
Yuk Hyeong-Dong Kang Min-Yong Tae Bum-Sik Ku Ja-Hyeon Kim Hyeon-Hoe Kwak Cheol Jeong Chang-Wook
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
Purpose: To evaluate the clinical impact of strict selection criteria for active surveillance (AS) of prostate cancer in a Korean population.
Materials and Methods: A single-center, prospectively collected AS cohort from December 2016 to February 2019 was used. Following pre-determined criteria, patients were categorized into ¡°strict AS¡± and ¡°non-strict AS¡± groups. Clinicopathological progression-free survival (PFS) and treatment-free survival (TFS) of the two groups were compared using the Kaplan?Meier curve and log-rank test. Age-adjusted hazard ratios for clinicopathological progression was calculated using Cox proportional regression analysis.
Results: Of 54 eligible patients, 25 and 29 were assigned to ¡°strict AS¡± and ¡°non-strict AS,¡± respectively. Clinicopathological progression and definitive treatment rates were 24.0% (6 of 25 patients) vs. 51.7% (15 of 29 patients) and 32.0% (8 of 25 patients) vs. 62.1% (18 of 29 patients) in ¡°strict AS¡± and ¡°non-strict AS¡± groups. Progress to high-risk cancer (pathologic T3 or surgical Gleason Grade 2 over) in radical prostatectomy was higher in ¡°non-strict AS¡± than ¡°strict AS¡±. PFS (mean 34.6¡¾2.9 mo vs. 22.6¡¾2.7 mo; p=0.025) and TFS (mean 31.8¡¾3.2 mo vs. 19.6¡¾2.4 mo; p=0.018) favor the ¡°strict AS¡± group than ¡°non-strict AS¡± group. Age-adjusted hazard ratio for clinicopathological progression of strict criteria was 0.36 (95% confidence interval, 0.14?0.94; p=0.04).
Conclusions: PFS and TFS were better in the ¡°strict AS¡± group than in the ¡°non-strict AS¡± group. This finding should be informed to relevant patients during decision making and considered in Korean guidelines.
|
|
KEYWORD
|
|
Active surveillance, Patient selection, Prostate neoplasms
|
|
FullTexts / Linksout information
|
|
|
|
Listed journal information
|
|
|